Decision Layer
AI Recommendations
6 open recommendations · $46,800 combined estimated impact
Sort by
Site
Complete list
Open recommendations
HIGHAI confidence 89%
Replace H2S media
KPS-6 Unit B · Site 3
Efficiency recovery +2.4%
$14,200estimated avoided curtailment
HIGHAI confidence 91%
Replace coalescing filter element
Site 1 · Conditioning Skid
Avoided generator fouling risk
$11,800estimated avoided damage
MEDIUMAI confidence 76%
Inspect Generator 3 exhaust valves
Site 2 · KPS-4.5
+1.6% availability
$8,400estimated avoided failure
MEDIUMAI confidence 82%
Shorten moisture-bed regeneration interval
Site 2 · KPS-4.5
Liquid carryover risk removed
$6,900estimated avoided fuel-train damage
LOWAI confidence 68%
Recalibrate Wobbe index monitoring
Site 3 · KPS-6 / KPS-3
Combustion efficiency +0.5%
$3,100estimated fuel savings
LOWAI confidence 64%
Trend booster compressor bearing vibration
Site 1 · KPS-3
Earlier bearing failure warning
$2,400estimated avoided downtime
Upsell positioning
Conditioning depth is the differentiator
Engineering differentiation
Why FGCT vs. minimal filtration
Conventional flare capture
- Minimal filtration — single knockout or basic scrubber
- Liquids, aerosols and particulate reach the fuel train
- Shorter generator and turbine overhaul intervals
- Unattended operation carries higher trip and fouling risk
- Fuel quality varies with wellhead conditions
KenTech FGCT
- Multi-stage conditioning: knockout → coalescing → particulate → H2S → moisture → compression
- Protects turbines and reciprocating generators from contaminant damage
- Engineered for continuous unattended operation
- Deliberately oversized vs. the power module for fuel-quality headroom
- Pressure- and quality-stable fuel regardless of inlet swings
Financial values are estimates based on available operational data and customer-configured assumptions.